Indiana

Yesterday the Governor of Indiana signed into law the ‘Religious Freedom Restoration Act’.  First let me say that I am not a legal expert.  I don’t understand the nuances of law language.  I read the language of the RFR Act, and I kind of shrugged my shoulders and wondered what the implications of such an ‘Act’ might have on individuals in Indiana.  After all, as far as I know, people everywhere in America are free to practice their religion, at least in theory.

It seems, however, that the RFR Act protects business owners who don’t want to serve certain kinds of people from being sued for discrimination.  Now, business owners have the protection of the state of Indiana to discriminate against whomever they like, so long as they have a ‘religious basis’ for it.  Human Rights Campaign, an organization that fights for LGBT equality, said in the Huffington Post yesterday “‘The evangelical owner of a business providing a secular service can sue claiming that their personal faith empowers them to refuse to hire Jews, divorcees, or LGBT people. A landlord could claim the right to refuse to rent an apartment to a Muslim or a transgender person'” (here is that article).

Two questions immediately pop into my mind when I think about this.  First, what kind of darkness is inside of the people who would advocate for such a law?  No religious system that I am aware of promotes discrimination of service or hiring practices.  I know many religious people who think this way, but I know of no basis for this type of discrimination in religious systems.  In which case, I would be interested to see what a legal argument based on religion would look like that would argue that, based on the religion of Christianity, a business owner is justified in refusing to serve ‘certain types of people’.  Consistency would require such ‘Christians’ to refuse service to those who are greedy, hateful, envious of others, murderers, adulterers, malicious people, argumentative people, gossips, backstabbers, prideful people, boastful people, promise breakers, any person who commits sexual sin, people who worship things over God, drunkards, thieves, abusers, cheaters, liars, slave-drivers, people who commit perjury, and children who disobey their parents.

Wait…that means consistency would require businesses to discriminate against everyone on the basis of religion.

The point of long-lists of vices such as these in the New Testament is not to emphasize the importance of Christian moral purity, a sort of Pharisaical distancing from sinners of all kinds, but to emphasize that all of us are equal.  We are all just as bad as everyone else.  This law stands no chance of surviving in court, and it evidences how deeply hateful and ugly religious people are and can be, and how they have decided to stay in bed with the government, committing idolatry themselves.

The second question is this: When did Christians miss the emphasis, found throughout the entire canon of Scripture, on loving neighbors, strangers, and enemies.  You see homosexuals as the enemy?  Jesus says to love them.  You see Muslims as the enemy?  Jesus says to love them.  This morning, on the Chicago Tribune website, Rex Huppke wrote, “I don’t know what faith would support the harm, the mental anguish, that comes from that kind of shunning, from the stubborn refusal to accept people for who they are and love them regardless” (read his article here).

The problem is that my homosexual friends know what kind of faith supports that sort of harm and shunning.  That faith, increasingly, is Christianity.  Christians in Indiana have chosen to lobby their state government to allow them to harm and shun anyone they think is impure or abominable.

This is anti-Christ.

For my friends that are especially alarmed by this legislation, who feel that they have been told loud and clear that Christians and Christianity does not accept them, please hear this:  I am a Christian, and I love you.  I am a Christian, and I see no basis for hurting you, holding you back, or telling you you are unlovable.  Heppke goes on to say in his article that he knows the faith of the majority of people in this country does not support this sort of inanity.  I agree.

May we be light and not darkness.

May we love all, knowing we are all just as bad as everyone else.

May we speak out against the discrimination of others, in the name of Jesus.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Indiana

  1. Do you think a Christian…
    1- carver should be forced to carve an idol for someone?
    2-hospital be forced to provide abortions?
    3-caterer be forced to serve a dinner for a gathering of Satanists?
    4- photographer be forced to take pictures of lewd acts?

    1. Show me a case in which a caterer or photographer or artisan were ‘forced’ to do these things, and you may have a point. If not, it’s just arguing that business owners should be allowed to reject people on the basis of their sexual orientation, as we know people weren’t concerned about being forced into being pornographers or feeding satanists. It’s not an easy bill to defend.

      1. It is a bill to defend on the basis of Religious freedom. Unless you have decided to disregard that right to others.

      2. I’ve realized I really don’t understand where you are coming from in your responses to my blogs. Do you read them, or just skim and comment? What exactly is the issue that you have with what I wrote? In what way is the RFR Act necessary?

    2. @faith alone
      I have a couple questions for you.
      1. How often does a florist make sure they aren’t allowing men to buy flowers for a mistress?
      2. How often do resort hotel employees ask straight couples if they are married in order to not support premarital sex or affairs?
      3. How often do bakers ask parents if the kid that they want to buy a cake for was born outside of wedlock?
      4. How often does a chef ask if the mom seen alone with her kids at a resturant went through a divorce?

      A lot of businesses serve people without any thought to morality. Why is it okay to treat the LGBT community different?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s